killamch89 Posted yesterday at 01:02 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:02 AM Nintendo’s famously insular, secrecy‑driven culture seems to foster both groundbreaking innovation and occasional risk aversion. How do you see this “top‑down” creative model manifest in their games? Does the tight internal ecosystem yield the consistent quality of Pikmin or Fire Emblem, or does it slow down experimentation beyond core IP? Compare it to more open studios where community feedback drives updates - does Nintendo’s approach yield more cohesive products or miss chances for iterative improvements? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...