killamch89 Posted May 19 Share Posted May 19 We often hear that NVMe SSDs load games faster than SATA drives, but what’s your hands‑on experience? Report concrete loading time comparisons between the two when launching maps, streaming assets, or installing patches. Did you notice texture pop‑ins or stutters on SATA drives that vanished with NVMe? How significant was the performance delta on your rig’s CPU and GPU? Were there any edge cases like games or engines that didn’t leverage the NVMe bandwidth? Beyond load times, did drive temperatures or noise levels factor into your preference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorpion Posted May 20 Share Posted May 20 I've noticed that NVMe SSDs offer significantly faster load times and better overall performance compared to SATA SSDs in gaming. Games launch quicker, and in-game transitions are smoother, making NVMe a worthwhile upgrade for a more responsive and enjoyable gaming experience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killamch89 Posted May 20 Author Share Posted May 20 For gaming specifically, I've found the real-world difference between my Samsung 870 EVO SATA and 970 EVO NVMe drives less dramatic than benchmarks suggest. Load times improved by 15-20% at most, not the 5-6x difference in raw speeds. The biggest upgrade was moving from HDD to any SSD; the jump from SATA to NVMe feels incremental rather than revolutionary for most games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
