killamch89 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 With recent shifts in Xbox’s strategy and decisions, such as the push for Game Pass and changes to exclusives, some have questioned Phil Spencer’s leadership. While he’s been praised for bringing Xbox into a more service-oriented approach, others feel his choices have led to setbacks in the console’s appeal. Do you think he’s done a great job steering Xbox, or is he not living up to expectations? What do you think of his impact on the gaming brand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorpion Posted January 6 Share Posted January 6 Phil Spencer’s leadership has revitalized Xbox's service model, but mixed results on exclusives could harm console appeal. It's a mixed legacy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killamch89 Posted May 13 Author Share Posted May 13 The metrics suggest Spencer's leadership has been mixed. First-party output remains inconsistent despite acquisitions, hardware sales lag behind PlayStation, yet Game Pass subscriptions and revenue growth tell a different story. A terrible CEO wouldn't have navigated the post-Xbox One recovery as effectively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shortie Posted May 15 Share Posted May 15 I wouldn't say that Phil Spencer is a terrible Xbox CEO. If it was not for Phil Spencer, we may not be where we are now with Xbox and gaming being available for so many more people. Phil Spencer wanted to aim to make gaming accessible for everyone and so far, he has made that happen with Xbox Cloud and also Xbox Game Pass and Game Pass Ultimate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
