Jump to content
Register Now
Cumulus

In-App Purchases in Games?

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, Justin11 said:

E.g; Fortnite developers are making cool money off through Fortnite item sales like the skin, weapons etc. 

There are so many of them they if one should think about getting them all, he should be looking at hundreds of a thousand of dollars. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Justin11 said:

E.g; Fortnite developers are making cool money off through Fortnite item sales like the skin, weapons etc. 

The skins are worth getting. It's not like they help you to win in the game like other pay to win games works. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Boblee said:

The skins are worth getting. It's not like they help you to win in the game like other pay to win games works. 

 

I'd disagree. The skins are more manipulative and more diabolically clever than you might think, especially on game aimed a younger audiences like Fortnite is. It's all about a kind of unspoken class structure. If you're a teenager playing session on Fortnite in lobby full of your School mates donning standard skins, bulling and kind of peer pressure that could put real pressure on vulnerable people to spend money.  I remember when I was in high school that kids got made fun of when they wore cheap brands of clothing or shoes, this the same sort of thing in more modern guise. If a lot of ways, the cosmetic microtransactions may be even worse than pay-to-win. I'd say they are even predatory and manipulative, especially in a game aimed at a younger audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shagger said:

 

I'd disagree. The skins are more manipulative and more diabolically clever than you might think, especially on game aimed a younger audiences like Fortnite is. It's all about a kind of unspoken class structure. If you're a teenager playing session on Fortnite in lobby full of your School mates donning standard skins, bulling and kind of peer pressure that could put real pressure on vulnerable people to spend money.  I remember when I was in high school that kids got made fun of when they wore cheap brands of clothing or shoes, this the same sort of thing in more modern guise. If a lot of ways, the cosmetic microtransactions may be even worse than pay-to-win. I'd say they are even predatory and manipulative, especially in a game aimed at a younger audience.

I do agree that it's a clever way to pull more money off the gamers and what I can categorically say is wrong would be that their acts is targeted to a much younger audience. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Boblee said:

The skins are worth getting. It's not like they help you to win in the game like other pay to win games works. 

It's just a way to get you enticed and loving their game. All those ad-ons are means of generating revenue in the game, that's why it is called pay to win games just as you described. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Justin11 said:

It's just a way to get you enticed and loving their game. All those ad-ons are means of generating revenue in the game, that's why it is called pay to win games just as you described. 

 

I don't know if I'm reading this all wrong or something, but it looks you're defending this sort of thing. Pay-to-win is never acceptable under any circumstances. It's takes away the accomplishment of victory, it removes any sense of fairness and valour in defeat, it invalidates competition, it's lazy and it's greedy. It makes a game worse if not ruin it completely, pure and simple and every time. And as I explained earlier, cosmetic microtransactions aren't much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shagger said:

 

I don't know if I'm reading this all wrong or something, but it looks you're defending this sort of thing. Pay-to-win is never acceptable under any circumstances. It's takes away the accomplishment of victory, it removes any sense of fairness and valour in defeat, it invalidates competition, it's lazy and it's greedy. It makes a game worse if not ruin it completely, pure and simple and every time. And as I explained earlier, cosmetic microtransactions aren't much better.

You know I can never support such extra means of money derivatives by the game creators, that's extortion. I don't like the idea of micro-transactions, it has deviated us from the spirit of the game to spending money like we're playing casino bets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Boblee said:

The skins are worth getting. It's not like they help you to win in the game like other pay to win games works. 

There is argument about most of the skins being good but it's not something that I would be open to getting lots of them even if I were to be picking money from the road. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Heatman said:

There is argument about most of the skins being good but it's not something that I would be open to getting lots of them even if I were to be picking money from the road. 

Some gamers are really obsessed with getting them and it's why there are tons of them being pushed to so many games. Just like it's done with Fortnite and League of Legends with about 1842 skins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Justin11 said:

Fortnite is shy away from catching league of legends when it comes to the number of skins created in their game. Fortnite is currently at 1270, while league of legend is poised at 1842, that's a big difference on them. 

Fortnite have approximately 1290 as of last month March 2022 and not 1270. Where did the last 20 skins went to? To the moon 🎑

But in all honesty, it's too much what they are pushing gamers to pay for in their games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...