Leaderboard

Maintaining the balance may be challenging, but worst case I have the upper hand as the superior being. It is much like a mafia racket; you're spot on. And the mafia has existed a long time and many of the most prominent crime families have lived long, rich lives. However, in this scenario the "racket" wouldn't be totally one-sided like before. I would offer protection from foreign threats, and if they wished, crush foreign rivals. Arbitrary symbols of "wealth" such as gems, precious metals, or currency would have no value to me as giant, nor would a luxury fabrics or extravagant wardrobes. Wouldn't even need a t-shirt. I'd good with a pair of shorts and running shoes, which ideally I would have brought with me before becoming stranded. My greatest assets would be human capital and control over it: based on what you have told me (and I now agree with this) I would need to maintain an equilibrium with the tiny people in order to meet my physical needs and survive. Taking a hundred cows (as you referenced) wouldn't be necessary when they instead agree to build a hundred factory farms, each with a workforce to match. Child labor laws are for them to work out not me. Even if I wanted to, it would be unrealistic for me to regulate such things But you haven't come up with a better solution or even a suitable alternative than I have to the question: how else to satisfy male sexual needs as a lone giant amidst of race of people the size of ants or even smaller? As a fully developed adult male with a healthy sexual appetite, masturbating wouldn't fulfill the totality of it, and like any guy, I would still masturbate a lot anyway. Wouldn't you? And wouldn't you take advantage of the situation, like any proper guy would? Top down orders to their government and volunteers (which includes a brothel) being out of the question, there would no choice but to crouch down and take what I need by force. Gently pinching the tiny women in between my fingers and lowering them into my collection jar. Any husband or father screaming in objections tempts fate by gaining my notice. With a hundred or so wives and daughters trapped in a glass bottle in my pocket, yes, I would stop at around that number. Having enough tiny beings who can satisfy any inexplicable whims, caprices, and urges I have, at any time, by making them do any unspeakable yet stimulating thing on or to my penis to make me ejaculate -- that would serve both to satisfy my male sexual needs and fuel my sense of machismo. As a male you imagine it as unpleasant because it's another guy's dick. But they are women. Truth told, I would even keep second glass collection jar in my pocket, containing tiny men who I use as a focus for all my frustrations. I could think of plenty of fiendish ideas to prank them that wouldn't be harmful: tapping my fingernail on the glass, shaking them. I'm a pretty active guy; there would be no showers. As mentioned, putting them to work cleaning my sticky, smelly feet at the end of each day would feel absolutely delightful. And that scale, everything would be magnified to them, so they may want gas masks or hazmat suits. But then, what fun is that for me? 😃 Again, you see it as probably cruelly unpleasant: is it that, or is it just harmless fun at their expense?

Again what gives you the idea that I wanted to suppress their rights by force? And it is my right as a customer to express my distaste at it. Wouldn't that also fall in free speech? I perceive it as an invasion of my personal space, for petty, political reasons, that affect maybe 1% of the world's population. Americans often seem to forget that they are not the world, I'm not from the US, and I have no stake in their petty political bickering, and even if I had the time and place for it is not in entertainment media, as in videogames. Believe me that's what I did immediately. And if they want to include politics in their games, they can forget me ever supporting a political campaign with my money. It is an invasion, because I play games in my personal space, and them injecting politics into games is at the least unexpected and unwelcome. What I mean is that they have no more moral right to lecture anyone on politics, they are not arbiters of ultimate truths and what is right and wrong. And as such using the platform they have access to for personal politics is morally questionable. And again: This is not the US, games are not only sold in Murica. They are equal in every part of the world. So they absolutely have no moral right to drag me into this fight, where both sides are questionable.

They did a small version already in the Switch port of Links Awakening, but I think a Zelda Maker would be interesting. Final Fantasy Maker would also be interesting, but would have to be specific to specific entries in the series, or it would have to be something new entirely.

If Johnny Depp hadn’t been in it, then I most likely never would have seen any of them. I’m not a fan of Disney. But I am however, obsessed with both Johnny Depp and Tim Burton. Unfortunately Tim had nothing to do with the movies. An interesting little tidbit of info: They got the idea of how to design the way Davy Jones looked from seeing coffee running down the side of a coffee cup.

Leno was good, but Johnny Carson was better. Both had their own unique charm that they brought to the show, but I still think Carson was the better of the two. And I agree the headlines were ROFLMAO material.

I can't stop listening to Blinding lights by the Weeknd