Reality vs Adventure

1) depends on the mood ‘hence’ flirt 2) redundant…every child is born of taking flirts seriously 3) Hell no. There are no reasons to flirt when you are taken. Unless you don’t want to burn bridges because you aren’t stable in a relationship. Fuck that groupy wife exchange shit. Well.,,,if she were Adriana Lima…bye bye ring No, I’m loyal If only cheese was too! Fuck cheese LOL inside joke

I was just thinking about putting that game in yesterday. The game is sitting on my stand while I contemplate. I'm not sure I'm ready for the challenge as I want to finish some games for this year. But why wait right?

Warning-satire Being in the country has extremely dangerous neighborhoods because many are borderline sun down towns. You can get killed getting gas at the gas station or murdered by cops if they don't like how you look. As soon as you get out of your vehicle you have to livestream everything you do. Many neighborhood folk have a whole arsenal of weapons in their trunk with zip ties and rope for lynchings. They have stand your ground laws only for the locals and they are free to kidnap you and detain you for whatever reason they want as citizen arrest and vigilanteism is perfectly legal only for the locals.

Both are good. Better Call Saul is slower moving with more talk. Breaking Bad has that wow factor with the dramatic story line. You need to watch it all the way through. It’s better

That IS weird. Also when you can see water drip off the camera lens. Surprised they don't use freakin windshield wipers.

Yeah he has the right to do what he wants as a private company and charge people. He also can allow all dangerous conspiracies, hate speech, and inciting and plotting violence and allow politicians to abuse their authority. And when enough people do it, who are you going to arrest? At what point? If you have millions of people planning a second attack on the capital for coup 2.0 on Twitter, then what can anybody do when that is their idea of free speech? Another thing about paying for free speech is what happens if something happens to your country like a war or some kind of disaster? Social media is extremely important to shine light on situations and paying a monthly subscription will just make humanitarian efforts that much harder than it already is. As far as laws, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States could possibly investigate the acquisition as they would have the right to since Saudi Arabia under Musk’s Twitter is now the second largest shareholder. Plus Quatar and China now currently holds a lot of stake in Twitter as investors. So it’s funny how Muskets and Trumpets worship Twitter’s free hate speech that is financially operated a large part by foreign assets. Could that influence the direction of Twitters free speech and national security? As far as fake truth social, there is no telling what dark money goes into that and frankly I consider it a terrorist site like 4chan. And fake truth social censors opposition that talks bad about orange messiah lol. And talk about conflicts of interest having an ex president who is running again and a bunch of investigations including running off with classified documents owns a social media. He’s already declared the FBI as enemies and incited others to threaten lives of FBI members and their family and led to a terrorist attack at an FBI building by a shooter who was killed. All that was incited by trump and republican members of congress.

The richest guy in the world buys Twitter, makes it private, and now wants to charge people to have access to Twitter. Is freedom of speech something that should be paid for? This seems like the direction of class warfare having social media something you can't use if you are poor. One day it's $8 and next thing you know it's $50 a month. Since Musk took over, bigots immediately went to their hate speech to test Twitter. Meanwhile, Musk has gotten rid of Twitter's humanitarian and ethics AI researchers. Advertisers are now leaving Twitter and a Federalist Society lawyer Mike Davis told Musk to threaten any and all advertisers by verbally shaming them and boycott any advertiser that leaves Twitter. Mike Davis on Twitter: "You have nearly 114,000,000 Twitter followers. Name and shame the advertisers who are succumbing to the advertiser boycotts. So we can counter-boycott them. And get your $8 monthly subscription going asap. So we can start to makeup for lost revenue now." Musk's Twitter response: “Thank you. A thermonuclear name & shame is exactly what will happen if this continues.” A thermonuclear name and shame if an advertisers chooses to not advertise? Of course you have the right to boycott for whatever reason, but to name and shame them for not wanting to advertise for non moderated hateful bigotry? Why would you want your company advertisement next to "N" this and "N" that? By the way Mike Davis is a Federalist Society member who is an extreme far right group and our U.S. Supreme Court conservatives are Federalist Society members who have the lowest American confidence in this supreme court for the entire history of the country. Even recently House speaker Nanci Pelosi's husband was attacked in his own home with attempted murder by a QANON far right terrorist who had zip ties on him and was looking for Nanci. This is a huge attack against our government and Musk openly engages in misinformation on Twitter: “There is a tiny possibility there might be more to this story than meets the eye.” He's referring to new conspiracy theories about Paul Pelosi. Then Musk leaves a link to Santa Monica Observer known for misinformation. SMO has also said that Hillary Clinton is dead and that there is a doublet taking her place. This is the guy who runs Twitter now. Sick world of narcissism we are in now. And of course MAGA worships the guy now and even 4chan underground terrorist social media is getting jealous. Dangerous times ahead

Type 2 fun in relation to gaming would be hunting animals, especially in RDR2. But I enjoy getting rewards such as cool looking gear. The hunting grounds in Horizon Zero Dawn was sometimes difficult too trying to get the gold medal. Type 3 fun would be games like Bloodborne where I go so far and earned some resources, then die and all was for naught. Then I delete the game because I lose motivation.

Something that is very important to consider and a very realistic problem would be available resources in order to make gaming products like the chips which we know has been in major short supply. And we see how vulnerable those resources are during war between Russia and Ukraine having most of the supply. If gaming doesn't find alternative means to build chips with, then that will likely be the end of it. Gaming won't go away naturally. Most likely it will become a part of everybody's lives in some way as it advances to meet the needs of every class/status/group no matter who you are. But with chip shortages, gaming will become a rich man's hobby. Then as the target audience changes to suit the needs of the wealthy, the games will become more adultish, xxx rated, lots of simulations, and just outright toxic to please the rich goons. Another situation could be a politically charged attack on gaming blaming it for violence and not conforming to authoritarian agendas which would limit access to gaming as well to literature and social media and everything else. Remember China wouldn't grant gaming developers a publishing license for a while for political reasons. They also limited amount of games to be played by kids using facial recognition technology. So politics is a real threat to the gaming world. And just as we see rich assholes buying up social media, rich assholes can also buy up game developers and publishers so as to control content for the masses. So enjoy it while gaming is still has creative freedom and expression.

Tell me, should freedom of speech have a charge now? Freedom of speech has just been bought. News is next

Bring back honor to a warrior. Defend humanity. Those who are warrior trained to take it away, they lack self awareness. You can’t have honor and lack self awareness. Unless you are a fully aware psychotic. If you are granted warrior status as psychotics then you crossed into dehumanization. That is the opposite of the foundations of a warrior. You become nothing more than a legalized serial killer.

Does evil have warriors? NO they have subjugated mindless killers

You can be a warrior mercenary or a warrior for whatever cause. You aren’t a true warrior if you are paid for it. A warrior has always held honor. When people try to take the honor away and declare themselves as warriors then we need new true honorable warriors to fight back.

Not pride, but honor. Honor makes the best warrior.

The article doesn't really explain how it would work. I think a better approach is what AC Valhalla has done in their difficulty options: Adjust difficulty, damage taken, damage given, parry response time, AI reaction, time being pursued, aiming, and there is probably more I'm not remembering. I wouldn't want an auto emotion adjustment if I'm trying new weapons and start getting whipped. Then they make it easier while I switch to better weapons and abilities expecting the challenge when it's now gone. Isn't that part of the challenge to use proper gear and abilities? It would decrease your strategy skills. Unless you are in rampage mode and the emotion detector says, well let's give em blood then. That would be cool. But what if you are trying to lose the cops and emotion detector says nuh uh bad boy, were gonna get you. We are the law MF.

Another Cyberpunk? That should be interesting. Make it 3rd person please!!! I wanna see my character.

That old lady in RE7 where her head follows your direction everywhere. That's seriously messed up

Watch Dogs Legion for me is the most disturbing atmosphere in a game I've ever played. You pretty much have the entire city of London fallen into military/corporate control who commits terrorist acts on its own people. Kidnaps them, tortures them. Nobody is safe. Drones everywhere checking you out policing you with soldiers on every corner arresting you and beating you. Behind every closed door of a public place is a room of torture. AI programmed to murder you. Everyone forced to wear a chip implanted into your head. You aren't safe anywhere. It's obviously scary when games have monsters in it, but when humans just do pure evil to other humans on a large scale, that's way beyond the pale that is seriously disturbing. And that nature resides in us, even more disturbing. Which makes the game very real.

Living in an age without Penicillin would be a short life, but I’d love to live in an older time. Everything would be much simpler to work right down the road and when you are done go home and sleep in the open air. No mosquitoes or too much humidity would be ideal. You depend on your own strength if your village is raided unlike today you get mowed down with a gun. But my simpler life would be in an age without guns well before the 1800’s. I’m thinking more like 500 BC.

Can’t say I agree. I thought it looked amazing and once you go out into the frontier areas with the forest and all maybe you would see a better comparison there. Besides the graphical comparison, the game itself I thought a lot of effort was put into it regardless of the remastered or original. And I don’t see how it’s not more popular than it is. The main story, the animus story, the dramatic ending, it all really brought some emotions that not many of the other games in the series has done. I mean, even certain battles at times they caught the emotion of characters. Even at one point Conner told Washington to basically fuck off. And it’s like, wow, no he just didn’t lol. The story had a roller coaster of emotions. Getting caught in the middle of a war, trying to take down templars, trying to protect his own people, the struggle with his father who actually is the son of Kenway in AC4. Then Desmond’s story and the relationship with his father. The creepy ISU Juno. 2012. It really was a big game. One of my favorites of the series.

This game is old but goes down as a legendary game

Now listen to the above song without the video. Tell me you don't grow a patriot in your heart. Fucking tomahawk. Legalize scalping mother fuckers. Tomahawk; run through the field for freedom. Protect your land. Who taught the British to fight? Natives. Who taught the patriots to fight? Natives. Guns won. Powder over blades. Ride them horses and dodge them bullets while you throw you tomahawk. Leap off your horse, if you managed to steal one from the colonizers; fucking scalp the mother fuckers. My tomahawk is my gun. I will bear arms with my tomahawk. You come and get me. I will ride through a field of bullets because I believe in up close strength. But you mother fuckers don't. I will jump over a line of red coats and do my special attack. Then I will scalp you while your compadres watch. You fucking took my land. I have all the right to kill you. To scalp you. That is my mission. I will get you. The war is never finished as long Tomahawks are still legal. The unamendment right.

Music video

It was awesome playing as a Native American wearing the Animal Spirit outfit. Even the default Assassin outfit for him looked good. My favorite weapon was the tomahawk with the Animal Spirt gear. This first video shows fighting rampage while he's in the Native gear. The fighting mechanics of the game are bad ass. It's worth watching the whole video. The second video here is in the DLC. You get new animal powers abilities which is shown in the video. I think all AC games should have these new abilities. One ability you turn into a ghost eagle and you can fly from rooftop to rooftop. Another is an invisibility ghost mode which was real fun to use and just creep up on people. Another is you call a pack of wolf ghosts who attack your enemies. Then there is the bear ghost which destroys everyone around you. You can see them in 2nd video.

I’ve been looking into this more and kind of gathered pieces of information here and there and I’m not claiming to be 100% correct, but just bringing info to the table. Supposedly languages have evolved a lot over the centuries in relation to gender and is still changing today in a natural evolution of language. Centuries ago some authors used gender neutral words. And even the past decades some countries have been changing words. Most recently that I know of being Sweden in 2015 added a gender neutral word to their dictionary, (hen) pronoun instead of using (hon or han) which means he or she. The Latin language vs Old English: Old English used a grammatical gender language using masculine, feminine, and neuter nouns that do not describe a natural sex. Latin differs in that it uses both grammatical and natural gender using masculine, feminine, and neuter nouns. Old English eventually evolved into modern English in the 1200-1300’s by dropping the grammatical gender nouns and that is why English is not a gendered language. The evolution of the Latin language actually dropped the neuter nouns and kept the gender nouns giving way to Romance Latin languages like Spanish. Which brings us to today where the language continues to evolve in the USA and Latin America and the USA is caught in political crosshairs but it supposedly was not the whites who promoted it. “White people did not make up Latinx,” he says. “It was queer Latinx people... They are the ones who used the word. Our little subgroup of the community created that. It was created by English-speaking U.S. Latinx people for use in English conversation.” https://www.history.com/news/hispanic-latino-latinx-chicano-background Also in this article from History Channel, says that the movement could have started in the early 2000’s and became more popular the past decade, but still only 4% of Latins use LatinX. With today’s political divisions and inclusivity, brings about exclusivity. So what I believe will eventually happen is some words will be changed in the dictionary, and the exclusivity types will want to ban dictionaries if not outright ban non gender conforming people themselves. I thought LatinX was ridiculous at first, but we are seeing the natural evolution of language. A huge problem however, is that Spanish is not Old English or Old Latin. It's a highly gendered language. The whole language will have to change. And if it does change, they would have to bring back (neuter) nouns and Spanish would reverse back to Old Latin or something??????????? And drop the natural gender nouns while integrating the grammatical gender nouns. So maybe in the next 500 years Latina America will be speaking a New Latin non gendered language. Never know. These things have happened before over a span of hundreds of years.