kingpotato

Yes I do remember some titles. In fact some games also had the extra animated footage. Which used to show some back story or something. In other cases it had the multiplayer installation. It had some of the multiplayer network server installation. It was fun to explore the second discs for many games. 

Exactly. It was such a funny time in the gaming world and actually we really loved it well back then. I can very much remember some of the adventure games demo I played back then. 

For me it has to be survival game in some context like creatures and zombies. I don't see the value of the games into car racing and stuff. I prefer something in which users are trying to survive. I know survival games are harder to create and take the most of the resources. But overall I think for those who are into game development budget always goes up and down based on the funding. 

Adventure, soccer and survival games are what I would give my thoughts to ever creating if I had the opportunity to do so. 
Gamers do love such kind of game genre. 

Maybe something between real and surreal world with a big twist in the middle with a lot of action, haha! Yeah, sometimes... Create something crazy is good for our sould (and for fun, as usual... haha).

I'm a Catholic, and this being the first Friday of Lent, he's just going to have to wait until tomorrow to get his meat.

Yep, it’s pretty damn scary - particularly in VR. I enjoyed it a lot, though. Very well made and memorable.

Just finished Resident Evil 7 last night, Damn that was the most scariest game I've ever played. (I dont play horror games that much)

I played it at a friend's house a couple of months back and I've been too scared to try it again lol.

I have been dealing with my apartment being flooded after some heavy rains. After shoving my gaming laptop in some rice for almost 3 days, it is working again. There doesn't seem to be any long term damage to most of my stuff so I am grateful.

My technique is one that has worked on almost any game with dungeons. Getting lost for about an hour, check map, get lost again, spent another hour with a Puzzle, Solve the puzzle which turned out to be something simple and dumb, get lost one more time and finally reach the objective.

I have to do something like that as Well! XD

I think anthem is being criticized for no reason. i loved the gameplay of anthem. I think it has potential. I am sure that more and more such high graphics game get in the market. I prefer having a strong story though something anthem like games lack. But fall out 76 is not worth it. I have seen the gameplay over and over and trying to decide if it's worth it. unless you played previous fall out games, it's not worth it. 

Fallout 76 I gave a fairly positive review but I just haven't really felt like playing it much lately even if I've enjoyed it despite how much of a mess it is.
Anthem on the other hand I freaking love and my opinion of it is pretty much diametrically opposed to the majority's. I'm seriously addicted to it and have loved every second I've played of it. Is it without its flaws though? Hell no and I do plan to point those out in my eventual review of it. But it's definitely on my top 10 games of 2019 list so far.

Though I've not had an opportunity to play Anthem yet, I do agree with you. Both games are indeed online-centric games from acclaimed single player-focused teams. It's interesting because I think that making an online game is VERY different to making a single player game and I think that both Fallout 76 and Anthem will unfortunately suffer polish-wise as a result. The good thing is that games like these can be updated over time. I seriously love Fallout 76. It's flawed but easily one of the highlights of last year for me from an adventure/RPG standpoint. I know I'm in the minority with that feeling, but I'm a sucker for Bethesda's RPGs. I think some gamers have been waiting like a monkey on their back to do something wrong and an online Fallout game was the time to strike. On the other hand, Bethesda haven't done much in placating them as they've made a shit ton of mistakes, too.

Today I had the opportunity to play Fallout 76 and Anthem and I have to say they are not bad games but they do fail on their main objective. The gameplay on their own have a lot of issues and they both feel like unpolished games that still need a lot of patches, I'm not going to mention all their issues because it has been discussed many times.The problem is the expectation for the games from both the fans and the developers. If you are a fan of Bethesda games and Bioware you will know that they have a history of incredible single player franchises, Elder Scrolls, Fallout, Mass Effect and Dragon Age series respectively, so we where all expecting that same single player experience from these games but that was our mistake, It is very hard to translate a single player experience with excellent narrative to a multiplayer, this was also the mistake of the developers for thinking they could do it and and also advertise the games as such. Both games where destined to fail because they could not recreate that single player experience that we are accustomed at from Bethesda and Bioware on a Multiplayer platform. 

Do you agree or do you have a different opinion as to why these games failed ?

My technique is one that has worked on almost any game with dungeons. Getting lost for about an hour, check map, get lost again, spent another hour with a Puzzle, Solve the puzzle which turned out to be something simple and dumb, get lost one more time and finally reach the objective.

Goat Simulator.

For me with Call of Duty I was mostly just really into how the series kept going in a more and more futuristic direction. When it stopped doing that and started going back to WW2 stuff and modern warfare stuff, I stopped buying the games.

Yes same can be said about DOOM. And though a lot has been changed about the game. It just makes you think how much graphics changing alone makes a big difference. I have noticed that part about the gaming over the period of time. Lot of games are making come back and that can be good but they offer pretty much the same gameplay from what I have noticed so far. 

@DylanC thats true I could be wrong, Sony might get arrogant due to the success of the PS4 and add a higher price tag, and of course better technology means expensive components so that could also be a factor. But I dont think they will make the same mistake like with the PS3 (599.99 dollars launch price)

I think there's a possibility that it'll come in a little higher than the PS4/XB1. That said, if I had to bet, I think the PS5 will be $399/£349 like this gen's consoles. Like @kingpotato, I've heard Microsoft are going to have a digital-only, budget SKU of their console which'll be interesting to see.

Of course it will be released on next-gen consoles and it makes sense to. The current consoles are very lacking in graphical power and the next GTA will be way bigger than the current one and have way more features so they will need way more juice for that. I can see a 2021 release for consoles (I think the next-gen consoles will be launched around this time.) with a 2022 release for us PC players. I just hope they don't turn the next GTA online into Saints Row ffs.

I think pokemon, mario, sonic, mortal kombat. They are kind of releasing same old stuff in new graphics. And they are not always adding the value. And same can be said about final fantasy. Though they are taking more serious approach with the stories. But they kind of release same turn based or FPS style games every release. No idea on how they would proceed with the game from here onwards. 

The reason why he has that sort of money to begin with is because he followed trends and was an appealing content creator. ANyone can do it, it's just a matter of being appealing and having a good set.