killamch89

Well this is positively huge news - if Xbox acquires Metal Gear, Sony will really have some serious competition because just imagine all future MG games coming out on Xbox only. Sony has really been slacking and Xbox keeps making a lot of big moves everyday. What do you guys think of this news?

It's not just that - if they'd also put some of that into developing the Epic Games store with useful and relevant features, they'd gain some customers as well. The only reason I even have the Epic Games launcher is primarily because of Rocket League - there's nothing appealing about their platform at all and Epic games store still lacks some basic features from launch.

Was just about to mention this - it's still the main mini-game I play in FF8. Don't forget the casino in GTA 5 online but I love the arcade games as well.

I'd go with the Daedric Armor just because it looks very intimidating. They'd think I'm some kind of monster instead of a regular mortal.

Fallout games where each side has their own skeletons in the closet and you have to side with one. Metal Gear has so many of them - off the top of my head I can remember Gray Fox, The Boss, Sniper Wolf and a few others.

When I was a kid I used to have Metal Gear Art Books as well as the Mortal Kombat ones. However, as of now, I don't have any art books.

When using a video game to push a real world political agenda like Fortnite did, it has no place because 1) most of the people who play these games typically use them to get away from stuff like this 2) Videogames are supposed to be fun and there's nothing fun about a political agenda-driven that's imposing its beliefs on its players. 3) It isn't part of the story or theme of the game and when you just suddenly start pushing it, it becomes bothersome. This is the mistake that Battlefield 5 made and it flopped horrendously. Videogames were based on creativity at least back in the days but most modern videogames lack exactly that - Having said that, I do support "creative" freedom over politics.

This is a very complex scenario but I'll say that in most instances, if the game starts "forcing" you to follow a path you don't want to, then the devs have to take responsibility for that. If you're given the option but another choice can be made and you still choose to follow that path, they you the player has to bear the consequences of that choice.

In Age Of Wushu, when the four most powerful clans in our server were all allied, they used to gang up on anyone that opposed them. So what my small clan of 7 members did was infiltrate each of the guilds and started causing mischief and getting them to fight each other. By that time, we were some of the strongest fighters in the kingdom so we kept instigating battles between them and we got other smaller guilds to ambush them. This weakened everyone else severely and then we took down their guilds and recruited some of their strongest members. We created two guilds - we had one that was the "face" which painted us as a traditional guild and then we had the original 7 member guild where we worked from in the shadows to maintain control of the server. It carried on like this for 2 years but then we all kinda got bored of the game because of some drastic changes which ruined the experience.